If you haven't noticed there has been an surprising amount of casual dresses with pockets. Now in a dress of any sort you should look elegant, classy, nice, etc... With a pocket it makes a gross buldge in the dress and it makes you look you know, not good. I mean if you're wearing an expensive dress and all your hair looks pretty and all that jazz, once you stick your hands in those pocket, all the credibility of how you look goes right out the window. It makes you look relaxed and chilled with your hands in your pockets, for god sake just stand up straight and look pretty
Why this dress, I would have loved it. This Laila Azhar dress itself is fantastic, but the pockets ruin it. For approx $390 the pockets should be removed.
A great white and simple american apparel tube dress, once again ruined by those gastly pockets that should be shoved with $!*#,
Dear Marc Jacobs:
This is a loverly red polka-dotted dress and great shoes that makes me drool. BUT, when you decided to sell this
dress for approx. $820 didn't it occur to you that pockets are the dumbest idea since furry boots???
4 comments:
Yeah...I saw one on Natalie Portman in a magazine and they were saying how "fashionable" it is. Yeah. Right.
I do not understand the whole pocket thing either, especially on a red carpet event, where I have seen many people wearing these pocket dresses, with their hands in their pockets. It doesn't make any sense to me.
Pockets are for hiding ugly hands and putting your used kleenexes in...AHEM.
Sarah, Queen of the 'cute purse' I understand your dilema. And our mothers all spent years trying to get us to take our hands out of our pockets, and here these designers go encouraging it. Tsk Tsk.
Post a Comment